linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: 2.6.31-rc7 crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A943290.5080606@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:50:56 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	shai@...lex86.org, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: 2.6.31-rc7 crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg_id

Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Ingo Molnar - Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:15:00PM +0200]
> | 
> | * Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org> wrote:
> | 
> | > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:12:01PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> | > >Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> | > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:53:45PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> | > >>> Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> | > >>>> Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
> | > >>>> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> | > >>>>
> | > >>>
> | > >> 
> | > >> Why?  The specs seem to indicate otherwise unless I am mistaken --
> | > >> Intel  systems programming guide, Vol 3A Part1, chapter 7 section
> | > >> 7.5.5 - Identifying Logical Processors in a MP system:
> | > >> <quote>
> | > >> After the BIOS has completed the MP initialization protocol, each logical
> | > >> processor can be uniquely identified by its local APIC ID. Software can
> | > >> access these APIC IDs in either of the following ways
> | > >> </quote>
> | > >> phys_pkg_id() indicates that the logical package id is being looked up,
> | > >> so local apic id should be used here no?
> | > >> What am I missing?
> | > >
> | > >initial apic id : it can not changed, there is fixed mapping from that to physical processor id aka socket id / node id.
> | > >
> | > >apic id: could be changed by BIOS to any value. there is no good way to get phys_pkg_id from that.
> | > >
> | > 
> | > But BIOS is supposed to change it to a sane value.  Until 2.6.30, 
> | > local apic id has been used to get phys_pkg_id for the 'flat' 
> | > apics!  What changed?  Was this changed for a BIOS bug?  Even the 
> | > intel books seem to indicate local apic usage!
> | 
> | We should revert to the .30 behavior unless there's a good reason 
> | (even in that case we'll solve the regression and do a workaround 
> | for vSMP). Yinghai?
> | 
> | 	Ingo
> 
> I'm definitely not APIC expert but since I was partially involved
> letme turn in.
> 
> Original commit which causes problem for vSMP seems to be due
> to cpu_has_apic bit turned off (ie due to being manually disabled
> or acpi table broken) so further read apic id will return plain
> zero (we're talking about 64 bits now). So frnakly I don't understand
> what is wrong with Ravikiran's patch. In case of apic disabled
> initial apic value will be used anyway (which is latched but
> actually may be changed, but it's not our case).

initial apic id and apic id could be different.

and we should use initial apic id to get correct phys pkg id in case BIOS set crazy apic id.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/