[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A9434DA.1010603@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00:42 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
<storm@...49152.net>, cebbert@...hat.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 13940] iwlagn and sky2 stopped working, ACPI-related
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> please try to attached patch, that will increae alignment from 32M to 64M.
>
> Hmm. That may indeed fix the problem, because we have:
>
> - working-2.6.30.log:
>
> Allocating PCI resources starting at b8000000 (gap: b6000000:4a000000)
>
> - not-working-2.6.31.log:
>
> Allocating PCI resources starting at b6000000 (gap: b6000000:4a000000)
>
> HOWEVER. We also have:
>
> - working-2.6.31_acpi=off.log:
>
> Allocating PCI resources starting at b6000000 (gap: b6000000:4a000000)
>
> ie it really does seem to be ACPI-related somehow: starting PCI
> allocations at that b6000000 address works perfectly fine if ACPI is not
> enabled.
>
> In the not-working version, we end up getting:
>
> [ 1.408588] pci 0000:00:1c.4: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:07
> [ 1.408593] pci 0000:00:1c.4: IO window: 0x2000-0x2fff
> [ 1.408600] pci 0000:00:1c.4: MEM window: 0xb6000000-0xb60fffff
> [ 1.408606] pci 0000:00:1c.4: PREFETCH window: disabled
> [ 1.408623] pci 0000:00:1c.5: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:08
> [ 1.408626] pci 0000:00:1c.5: IO window: disabled
> [ 1.408633] pci 0000:00:1c.5: MEM window: 0xb6100000-0xb61fffff
> [ 1.408639] pci 0000:00:1c.5: PREFETCH window: disabled
>
>
> while in the working version we have:
>
> - ACPI off - looks like a BIOS allocated memory window:
>
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.4: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:07
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.4: IO window: 0x3000-0x3fff
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.4: MEM window: 0xf4500000-0xf45fffff
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.4: PREFETCH window: disabled
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.5: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:08
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.5: IO window: disabled
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.5: MEM window: 0xf4600000-0xf46fffff
> [ 0.290854] pci 0000:00:1c.5: PREFETCH window: disabled
interesting, when acpi=off, BIOS does allocate resource for them
[ 0.261960] pci 0000:07:00.0: reg 10 64bit mmio: [0xf4500000-0xf4503fff]
[ 0.261970] pci 0000:07:00.0: reg 18 io port: [0x3000-0x30ff]
[ 0.262049] pci 0000:07:00.0: supports D1 D2
[ 0.262051] pci 0000:07:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D2 D3hot D3cold
[ 0.262058] pci 0000:07:00.0: PME# disabled
[ 0.272117] pci 0000:00:1c.4: bridge io port: [0x3000-0x3fff]
[ 0.272122] pci 0000:00:1c.4: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xf4500000-0xf45fffff]
[ 0.272212] pci 0000:08:00.0: reg 10 64bit mmio: [0xf4600000-0xf4601fff]
[ 0.272321] pci 0000:08:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
[ 0.272330] pci 0000:08:00.0: PME# disabled
[ 0.280128] pci 0000:00:1c.5: bridge 32bit mmio: [0xf4600000-0xf46fffff]
>
> - ACPI on - we allocated the memory window, but at 0xb8000000+, rather
> than directly after end-of-RAM:
>
> [ 0.842970] pci 0000:00:1c.4: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:07
> [ 0.842975] pci 0000:00:1c.4: IO window: 0x2000-0x2fff
> [ 0.842983] pci 0000:00:1c.4: MEM window: 0xb8000000-0xb80fffff
> [ 0.842989] pci 0000:00:1c.4: PREFETCH window: disabled
> [ 0.843012] pci 0000:00:1c.5: PCI bridge, secondary bus 0000:08
> [ 0.843016] pci 0000:00:1c.5: IO window: disabled
> [ 0.843023] pci 0000:00:1c.5: MEM window: 0xb8100000-0xb81fffff
> [ 0.843029] pci 0000:00:1c.5: PREFETCH window: disabled
>
> ie for some reason ACPI caused that bus to be re-allocated, and
> re-allocating it right after the memory window doesn't work.
>
> Crazy.
>
> I wonder what is hiding at that 0xb6000000 address. And while I think that
> in this case rounding up to 64MB will fix it, I worry that our old model
> (of never starting directly after RAM, even if it was aligned) may not
> have been safer.
>
acpi does clear sth.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists