lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090825185911.GB5806@lenovo>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:59:11 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	shai@...lex86.org, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: 2.6.31-rc7 crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg_id

[Yinghai Lu - Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:50:56AM -0700]
...
| > | We should revert to the .30 behavior unless there's a good reason 
| > | (even in that case we'll solve the regression and do a workaround 
| > | for vSMP). Yinghai?
| > | 
| > | 	Ingo
| > 
| > I'm definitely not APIC expert but since I was partially involved
| > letme turn in.
| > 
| > Original commit which causes problem for vSMP seems to be due
| > to cpu_has_apic bit turned off (ie due to being manually disabled
| > or acpi table broken) so further read apic id will return plain
| > zero (we're talking about 64 bits now). So frnakly I don't understand
| > what is wrong with Ravikiran's patch. In case of apic disabled
| > initial apic value will be used anyway (which is latched but
| > actually may be changed, but it's not our case).
| 
| initial apic id and apic id could be different.

yes, I know. initial one is latched by pins though still
could be changed (not always).

| 
| and we should use initial apic id to get correct phys pkg id in case BIOS set crazy apic id.

indeed, as function name implies. Need more code reading...
So (64 bits) at least generic_identify is not guilty since it uses initial
one from scratch. Need more code reading...

| 
| YH
| 
	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ