[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A943D37.4030604@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:36:23 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shai@...lex86.org, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: 2.6.31-rc7 crash due to buggy flat_phys_pkg_id
Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:50:56AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>
>> initial apic id and apic id could be different.
>>
>> and we should use initial apic id to get correct phys pkg id in case BIOS set crazy apic id.
>>
>
> Is there a specific bug we are fixing here? Again, this behavior was
> present from atleast 2.6.15-2.6.30 on 'flat' and older 'cluster' apics, and intel
> documentation suggests local apic be used. Is there a specific bios bug
> that is being fixed?
>
> (The BIOS is not supposed to set a crazy apic ID. The BIOS is buggy in that
we can not stop BIOS doing crazy thing.
for AMD 8 socket 4 cores system. BSP apic id : 4 or 8, and initial apic id is 0:
with apic id in phys_pkg_id, will get pkg id: 1, 2, ...
with initial apic id will get pkg id: 0, 1, 2, 3.
when I was working on LinuxBIOS, I did have one porting to have
BSP: 0
AP: start from 5, 6, 7...
that will have strange in pkg_id.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists