[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090825214020.GF8215@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:40:21 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
jiayingz@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] add trace events for each syscall entry/exit
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 02:50:27PM +0200, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> Most arch syscall_get_nr() implementations returns -1 if the syscall
> number is not valid. Accessing the bit field without a check might
> result in a kernel oops (at least I saw it on s390 for ftrace selftest).
>
> Before this change, this problem did not occur, because the invalid
> syscall number (-1) caused syscall_nr_to_meta() to return NULL.
>
> There are at least two scenarios where syscall_get_nr() can return -1:
>
> 1. For example, ptrace stores an invalid syscall number, and thus,
> tracing code resets it.
> (see do_syscall_trace_enter in arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c)
>
> 2. The syscall_regfunc() (kernel/tracepoint.c) sets the TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE
> (now: TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT) flag for all threads which includes
> kernel threads.
> However, the ftrace selftest triggers a kernel oops when testing syscall
> trace points:
> - The kernel thread is started as ususal (do_fork()),
> - tracing code sets TIF_SYSCALL_FTRACE,
> - the ret_from_fork() function is triggered and starts
> ftrace_syscall_exit() with an invalid syscall number.
>
> To avoid these scenarios, I suggest to check the syscall_nr.
>
> For instance, the ftrace selftest fails for s390 (with config option
> CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS set) and produces the following kernel oops.
>
> Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 2000000000
>
> Oops: 0038 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc6-next-20090819-dirty #18
> Process kthreadd (pid: 818, task: 000000003ea207e8, ksp: 000000003e813eb8)
> Krnl PSW : 0704100180000000 00000000000ea54c (ftrace_syscall_exit+0x58/0xdc)
> R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:1 PM:0 EA:3
> Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000000 00000000000e0000 ffffffffffffffff 20000000008c2650
> 0000000000000007 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 000000003e813d78
> 000000003e813f58 0000000000505ba8 000000003e813e18 000000003e813d78
> Krnl Code: 00000000000ea540: e330d0000008 ag %r3,0(%r13)
> 00000000000ea546: a7480007 lhi %r4,7
> 00000000000ea54a: 1442 nr %r4,%r2
> >00000000000ea54c: e31030000090 llgc %r1,0(%r3)
> 00000000000ea552: 5410d008 n %r1,8(%r13)
> 00000000000ea556: 8a104000 sra %r1,0(%r4)
> 00000000000ea55a: 5410d00c n %r1,12(%r13)
> 00000000000ea55e: 1211 ltr %r1,%r1
> Call Trace:
> ([<0000000000000000>] 0x0)
> [<000000000001fa22>] do_syscall_trace_exit+0x132/0x18c
> [<000000000002d0c4>] sysc_return+0x0/0x8
> [<000000000001c738>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc
> Last Breaking-Event-Address:
> [<00000000000ea51e>] ftrace_syscall_exit+0x2a/0xdc
>
> Signed-off-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
I'm queueing this one for .32
Thanks.
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,8 @@ void ftrace_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs
> int syscall_nr;
>
> syscall_nr = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
> + if (syscall_nr < 0)
> + return;
> if (!test_bit(syscall_nr, enabled_enter_syscalls))
> return;
>
> @@ -254,6 +256,8 @@ void ftrace_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs
> int syscall_nr;
>
> syscall_nr = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
> + if (syscall_nr < 0)
> + return;
> if (!test_bit(syscall_nr, enabled_exit_syscalls))
> return;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists