lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A94B529.1080308@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:08:09 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
	Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
	rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is
 possible

Pavel Machek wrote:

> Ok, can you help? Having a piece of MD documentation explaining the
> "powerfail nukes entire stripe" and how current filesystems do not
> deal with that would be nice, along with description when exactly that
> happens.

Except of course for the inconvenient detail that a power
failure on a degraded RAID 5 array does *NOT* nuke the
entire stripe.

A 5-disk RAID 5 array will have 4 data blocks and 1 parity
block in each stripe.  A degraded array will have either
4 data blocks or 3 data blocks and 1 parity block in the
stripe.

If we are dealing with a parity-less stripe, we cannot
lose any data due to RAID 5, because each of the 4 data
blocks has a disk block available.  We could still lose
a data write due to a power failure, but this could also
happen with the RAID 5 array still intact.

If we are dealing with a 3-data, 1-parity stripe, then
3 of the 4 data blocks have an available disk block and
will not be lost (if they make it to disk).  The only
block that maintains on all 3 data blocks and the parity
block being correct is the block that does not currently
have a disk to be written to.

In short, if a stripe is not written completely on a
degraded RAID 5 array, you can lose:
1) the blocks that were not written (duh)
2) the block that doesn't have a disk

The first part of this loss is also true in a non-degraded
RAID 5 array.  The fact that the array is degraded really
does not add much additional data loss here and you certainly
will not lose the entire stripe like you suggest.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ