[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826045200.GA4332@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:52:00 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 07:02:47PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:28:30 -0700
>akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>
>> kcore-use-usual-list-for-kclist.patch
>> kcore-add-kclist-type.patch
>> kcore-register-vmalloc-area-in-generic-way.patch
>> kcore-register-text-area-in-generic-way.patch
>> walk-system-ram-range.patch
>> kcore-use-registerd-physmem-information.patch
>> kcore-use-registerd-physmem-information-fix.patch
>> kcore-use-registerd-physmem-information-checkpatch-fixes.patch
>> kcore-use-registerd-physmem-information-define-node__pfn-for-non-numa-builds.patch
>> kcore-use-registerd-physmem-information-fix2.patch
>
>These patches are reported to break bisection.
>If dropped, I'll remake.
Confused... what is "break bisection"? :-/
But these patches were sent via two patchsets, since they
are aimed to fix one problem, IMO it's better to hold them
in one patch set, maybe this can solve some dependence
problem...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists