linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.31-rc7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1251268018.18434.16.camel@gaiman.anholt.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:26:58 -0700
From:	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
	mailing54 <mailing54@...k.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Ma Ling <ling.ma@...el.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.31-rc7

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:47 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Linus
> Torvalds<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> > In my experience, the BIOS setup doesn't reflect what outputs should be
> >> > used at runtime, and certainly not the correct configuration of the
> >> > enabled outputs.  For example, if we went to this, the giant monitor
> >> > attached to my laptop that I actually look at would go unused.
> >>
> >> yeah, normally VBIOS startup just needs or only can driver one pipe, so
> >> we don't have any pre knowledge except detect everything.
> >
> > Umm. What's your guys point, exactly?
> >
> > The fact is, as-is, YOU DETECT THE WRONG OUTPUTS!
> >
> > If you actually detected things _right_, none of this would be an issue.
> > But you don't. And you seem to have a really hard time even admitting
> > that. You try to re-detect things, and you SCREW UP.
> 
> This isn't anything to do with redetection, and in the Mac case there isn't
> even a BIOS table that you can really rely on since Apple hard coded all
> this stuff into their EFI and Mac OSX drivers.
> 
> Now you probably get a video bios using Apples bios layer, but it also
> is most likely not telling anything close to the truth about the hw layout.
> 
> Just because the BIOS manages to light up an output in now way effects
> whether the driver can do the same.
> 
> >
> >> we already have some mac relate bugs open, but please report on it so we
> >> do have people with hardware to try and response. We have recently got a
> >> MacBook, yakui is looking after the modesetting issue on it.
> >
> > Quite frankly, I've reported these things several times. I've been open to
> > try patches. Nothing has ever come out of it.
> >
> > I have a Mac Mini that I reported as broken over a month ago. I have a
> > Westemere I've reported as not doing any DDC probing - and that I have to
> > disable the LVDS probing on entirely in order to not make KMS set up the
> > display to go to a non-existent LVDS port.
> >
> > You claim that you "detect everything", but quite frankly, you don't. The
> > KMS code seems to assume that if it's a mobile chipset, it should have an
> > LVDS output - and whether anything is connected to that or not is totally
> > immaterial. There's clearly _zero_ "detection" going on.
> >
> > And the thing is, X seems to get it right, at least more often than KMS
> > does.
> >
> 
> I'm not sure why the mac-mini hack hasn't been merged I asked for it a
> few times,
> I'd rather the proper solution was merged but that seems to not have
> happened either.

Your complaint about needing to do the proper solution was why I never
merged it.  It looked like a NAK to me.

-- 
Eric Anholt
eric@...olt.net                         eric.anholt@...el.com



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)