[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A94DFF4.5030301@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:10:44 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/profile: Fix profile_disable vs module_unload
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 08:46 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> Aahh, I see the bug, its only ftrace that knows about the module, not
>> tracepoints themselves, _that_ needs fixing.
>
> You could possibly do something like:
>
> struct module *tp_mod = __module_address(&some_tp_symbol);
> struct module *cb_mod = __module_text_address(func);
>
> if (tp_mod && tp_mod != cb_mod) {
> ret = try_get_module(tp_mod);
> if (ret)
> goto fail;
> }
>
> in register_trace_##name() or thereabout.
>
Actually I tried it, but it didn't work. As I said, You can't find
any tp symbol when registering tp callback. The same example again:
In module bar, we have register_trace_foo()
In module foo, we have DEFINE_TRACE(foo) and trace_foo().
bar doesn't know any symbol of foo, so it can't bump foo's refcnt,
*Note: you can load module bar without loading module foo*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists