[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251273755.16910.16.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:02:35 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: raz ben yehuda <raziebe@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, riel@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, andrew motron <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
wiseman@...s.biu.ac.il, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:29 +0300, raz ben yehuda wrote:
> OFFSCHED is bad name to my project. My project is called SOS = Service
> Oriented System.
> SOS, has nothing to do with Real time.
??
The paper you pointed me at maintains it's very much about realtime.
<quote>
This paper argues that OFFSCHED fits to the niche of Multiprocessors
real time systems by partitioning a system to two; the operating system
and OFFSCHED. OFFSHCED is a hybrid system. It is hybrid because it is
both real time and still a regular Linux server. Real time is mainly
achieved by the NMI characteristic and the CPU isolation. It is a hybrid
system because OFFSCHED scheduler interacts with the operating system.
</quote>
-Mike.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists