[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826080811.GG23435@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:08:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shai@...lex86.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix vsmp booting with phys_pkg_id changing
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> 2.6.31-rc7 does not boot on vSMPowered systems.
>
> [ 8.501108] CPU31: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM1)
> [ 8.501127] CPU 31 MCA banks SHD:2 SHD:3 SHD:5 SHD:6 SHD:8
> [ 8.650254] CPU31: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5540 @ 2.53GHz stepping 04
> [ 8.710324] Brought up 32 CPUs
> [ 8.713916] Total of 32 processors activated (162314.96 BogoMIPS).
> [ 8.721489] ERROR: parent span is not a superset of domain->span
> [ 8.727686] ERROR: domain->groups does not contain CPU0
> [ 8.733091] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> [ 8.737975] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> [ 8.742416]
>
> bisected to
> |
> | commit 2759c3287de27266e06f1f4e82cbd2d65f6a044c
> | x86: don't call read_apic_id if !cpu_has_apic
> |
>
> need to use apic id in phys_pkg_id for vsmp...
>
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ static struct apic *apic_probe[] __initd
> NULL,
> };
>
> +static int apicid_phys_pkg_id(int initial_apic_id, int index_msb)
> +{
> + return hard_smp_processor_id() >> index_msb;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Check the APIC IDs in bios_cpu_apicid and choose the APIC mode.
> */
> @@ -69,6 +74,11 @@ void __init default_setup_apic_routing(v
> printk(KERN_INFO "Setting APIC routing to %s\n", apic->name);
> }
>
> + if (is_vsmp_box()) {
> + /* need to update phys_pkg_id */
> + apic->phys_pkg_id = apicid_phys_pkg_id;
> + }
Ok, this looks like a rather straightforward quirk - and vSMP is
indeed special in that it sets up overlapping APIC ids. It's also
the smaller patch with basically zero cross section to other
systems, so a lot more -rc7 worthy.
So i've applied it to x86/urgent (with small edits to the
changelog). Any objections from anyone?
Note, should any other, real hardware show problems with , we might
still have to consider reverting the original change in 2759c32.
It's borderline.
Btw., the code is still not fully clean. For example this bit in
generic_identify():
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
# ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
c->apicid = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid, 0);
# else
c->apicid = c->initial_apicid;
# endif
#endif
and in another place we have:
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
c->apicid = apic->phys_pkg_id(c->initial_apicid, 0);
#endif
This ifdeffery could probably be removed and we could call
->phys_pkg_id() all the time, right?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists