[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090826182634.3968.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:32:47 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [mmotm][PATCH 0/4] per-process OOM kill v3
Changelog
since v2
- rebase to latest mmotm
- fixed strstrip abuse
- oom_adjust_write() use strict_strtol() instead simple_strtol()
- remove unnecessary signal lock (pointed by Oleg)
--------------------------------------------------------
The commit 2ff05b2b (oom: move oom_adj value) move oom_adj value to mm_struct.
It is very good first step for sanitize OOM.
However Paul Menage reported the commit makes regression to his job scheduler.
Current OOM logic can kill OOM_DISABLED process.
Why? His program has the code of similar to the following.
...
set_oom_adj(OOM_DISABLE); /* The job scheduler never killed by oom */
...
if (vfork() == 0) {
set_oom_adj(0); /* Invoked child can be killed */
execve("foo-bar-cmd")
}
....
vfork() parent and child are shared the same mm_struct. then above set_oom_adj(0) doesn't
only change oom_adj for vfork() child, it's also change oom_adj for vfork() parent.
Then, vfork() parent (job scheduler) lost OOM immune and it was killed.
Actually, fork-setting-exec idiom is very frequently used in userland program. We must
not break this assumption.
This patch moves oom_adj to signal_struct instead mm_struct. signal_struct is
shared by thread but isn't shared vfork.
Sorting out OOM requirements:
-----------------------
- select_bad_process() must select killable process.
otherwise OOM might makes following livelock.
1. select_bad_process() select unkillable process
2. oom_kill_process() do no-op and return.
3. exit out_of_memory and makes next OOM soon. then, goto 1 again.
- vfork parent and child must not shared oom_adj.
My proposal
-----------------------
- oom_adj become per-process property. it have been documented long time.
but the implementaion was not correct.
- oom_score also become per-process property. it makes oom logic simpler and faster.
- remove bogus vfork() parent killing logic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists