[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826111704.GA25485@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:17:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: kmemcheck: Caught 32-bit read from uninitialized
memory (f6f6e1a4), by kmemleak's scan_block()
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Catalin
> >> Marinas<catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> >> >> Does this look OK to you?
> >> >
> >> > For the kmemleak.c part:
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> >>
> >> Vegard? Ingo? The patch is based on tip/out-of-tree so it
> >> probably should go to the kmemleak tree?
> >
> > I'm testing it currently - but yeah, i'd agree that it should go
> > into the kmemleak tree, with a .32 merge date or so.
>
> Ingo/Vegard, ACK/NAK? I don't want my amazingly good patch to end
> up in /dev/null so can we just shove it in kmemleak.git?
ack from me.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists