[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826162342.GA15868@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:23:42 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] thermal: add sanity check for the passive attribute
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:17:23PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Values below 40000 milli-celsius (limit is somewhat arbitrary)
> don't make sense and can cause the system to go into a thermal
> heart attack: the actual temperature will always be lower and
> thus the system will be throttled down to its lowest setting.
Not keen on this - it's a pretty arbitrary cutoff, and there are some
cases where someone might want this value. Policy belongs in userspace,
and all that.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists