[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A957073.10302@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:27:15 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, jeremy@...source.com,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] XEN: enlighten, use uninitialized_var(cx)
On 08/25/2009 11:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> index e90540a..5ab75e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx,
>>
>> static __init void xen_init_cpuid_mask(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned int ax, bx, cx, dx;
>> + unsigned int ax, bx, uninitialized_var(cx), dx;
>
> Please dont use uninitialized_var(), it's an unreliable facility: if
> this variable ever grows a real used-without-initialization bug in
> the future, the compiler warning is turned off permanently. It's
> rare but might happen. We are better off with initializing it to
> zero.
>
I hadn't seen this thread, but I pushed a patch to x86/urgent to do
exactly that while I was committing the Xen crash patch last night.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists