[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826173839.GA20175@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:38:39 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Fernando Luis V??zquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: t-sato@...jp.nec.com, m-hamaguchi@...jp.nec.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] filesystem freeze: fix sys_umount induced perpetual freeze
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:00:01PM +0900, Fernando Luis V??zquez Cao wrote:
> The current locking scheme for filesystem freeze avoids races between
> freeze_bdev() and do_umount() by taking the s_umount semaphore.
>
> If freeze_bdev() wins the race the process that invoked sys_umount
> will sleep until thaw_bdev releases the semaphore. Unfortunately, this
> will never happen because thaw_bdev bails out early the
> bd_fsfreeze_count check having failed (the count is 0).
>
> The problem is that the block_device that ioctl_fsthaw() passes to
> thaw_bdev() is not the one that we freezed because before sleeping in
> deactivate_super() do_umount() released the dentry (dput()) and freed
> the vfs mount (free_vfsmnt()).
>
> This patch works around this issue by checking the freeze level in
> do_umount()
This should be solved my my freeze locking rewrite:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=124933489118480&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=124933491918517&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists