[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090826121619.2bc7e72b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:16:19 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lenb@...el.com, rui.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI processor: force throttling state when BIOS
returns incorrect value
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:43:34 +0200
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl> wrote:
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ struct throttling_tstate {
> #define THROTTLING_POSTCHANGE (2)
>
> static int acpi_processor_get_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr);
> -int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr, int state);
> +int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> + int state, bool force);
>
WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files
#74: FILE: drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:65:
+int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr,
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 137 lines checked
checkpatch speaketh truth - there's already a declaration in
acpi/processor.h anyway.
I'll leave it alone though. Cleaning up acpi code isn't on the agenda
for today.
Please integrate checkpatch into your patch preparation tools. It
finds stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists