linux-kernel - Re: AlacrityVM benchmark numbers updated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A958BA0.2000801@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:23:12 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
CC:	alacrityvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AlacrityVM benchmark numbers updated

On 08/26/2009 09:42 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Actually, I have already look at this and it does indeed seem better to
> use switch_mm+gupf() over gup() by quite a large margin.  You could then
> couple that with your DMA-engine idea to potentially gain even more
> benefits (though probably not for networking since most NICs have their
> own DMA engine anyway).
>
>    

For tx, we'll just go copyless once we plumb the destructors properly.  
But for rx on a shared interface it is impossible to avoid the copy.  
You can only choose if you want it done by the cpu or a local dma engine.


-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/