[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908261627390.11291@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:21:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/profile: Fix profile_disable vs module_unload
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> > Anyway, this prevents your tracepoints from doing the odd things of
> > loading a probe before it exists. Well you can, but then you prevent the
> > unload of the module that registered it. Fine, I chucked out that patch.
> >
>
> you should try adding the required tracepoint_synchronize_unregister()
> call to ftrace_profile_disable_##call in ftrace.h. I expect this will
> fix your problem.
Just did, and it did not solve the bug.
>
> Note that this is a bit slow to call it at each unregistration. Ideally,
> a module containing tracepoint probes should call this synchronization
> primitive only once at module unload.
The bug looks like it is registering a probe, but not unregistering it
before leaving the module. But when the module is loaded again, it now has
a bad function to call when the tracepoint is hit.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists