[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090826213024.GA20428@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:30:24 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>,
Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Rui Santos <rsantos@...popie.com>,
Michael B??ker <m.bueker@...lin.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Reduce looping in the interrupt handler.
Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> :
[...]
> It is a bit weird but it also means we aren't playing silly games
> with status inside the loop. So if we go through the loop we ack
> everything in status.
I fear we have some longstanding problem anyway :
1. quiescent state
2. packets are received
3. rtl8169_interrupt schedules napi, clears IntrStatus and exits
4. packets are received and some non-napi event happens
5. rtl8169_interrupt wakes up, reads IntrStatus and goes on...
6. rtl8169_poll wakes up, processes Rx and Tx napi events and goes on...
7. tp->intr_mask still equals ~tp->napi_event : rtl8169_interrupt
handler does not even try to schedule napi.
8. more packets are received
9. rtl8169_interrupt clears IntrStatus
a. rtl8169_poll reenables napi scheduling, updates IntrMask and exits
b. rtl8169_interrupt reads a perfectly clean IntrStatus and exits
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists