| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:34:13 +0300 From: raz ben yehuda <raziebe@...il.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, maximlevitsky@...il.com, cfriesen@...tel.com, efault@....de, riel@...hat.com, wiseman@...s.biu.ac.il, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:40:09 -0400 (EDT) > Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > Peter has not given a solution to the problem. Nor have you. > > What problem? > > All I've seen is "I want 100% access to a CPU". That's not a problem > statement - it's an implementation. > > What is the problem statement? > > > My take on these patches: the kernel gives userspace unmediated access > to memory resources if it wants that. The kernel gives userspace > unmediated access to IO devices if it wants that. But for some reason > people freak out at the thought of providing unmediated access to CPU > resources. > > Don't get all religious about this. If the change is clean, > maintainable and useful then there's no reason to not merge it. thank you Mr Morton. thank you !!! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists