[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908271052370.27674@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:56:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/profile: Fix profile_disable vs module_unload
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Looks good. Just don't forget to eventually add the "synchronize" calls
> between tracepoint unregistration and the removal of their module. There
> is a race condition in the way you do it currently.
I'm trying to figure out the race here. What will disappear in the
tracepoint? Could you give a brief example of the issue.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists