[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090827202709.GK29382@infomag.iguana.be>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:27:09 +0200
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix book E watchdog to take WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT arg in
seconds
Hi Josh,
> >Now we only need someone that can look at the CONFIG_4xx cases still :-)
>
> It seems the FSL watchdog is much more flexible than the one found in 4xx
> cores. On 4xx, you basically have 4 static choices that represent specific
> times determined by the clock frequency. I'm concerned that the lack of
> granularity here will result in less than desirable behavior.
>
> For example, with a 400MHz clock you would get choices of roughly:
>
> 5.2 ms
> 83.9 ms
> 1.34 s
> 21.47 s
>
> Personally, I consider the first two options basically unusable. Considering
> the second two, if a user were to say "Set the timeout for 2 seconds" they
> would then get a timeout of 21 seconds with the framework Chris' patch has
> set up. That doesn't really seem to be ideal to me.
Hmm, my opinion: in that case we should use a timer that triggers the watchdog until userspaces times out (like we do for other watchdogs allready). Maybe we should split this driver. I have the same issue with the Freescale i.mx driver that is under review also.
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists