[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090827003047.GA30341@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:30:47 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, acme@...hat.com,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: blktrace ftrace plugin, was Re: Receive side performance issue
with multi-10-GigE and NUMA
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:40:27PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> We are also converting non-trivial plugins to generic tracepoints. A
> recent example are the system call tracepoints, but we also
> converted blktrace and kmemtrace to generic tracepoints.
On something semi-related: Any reason to keep the blktrace ftrace
plugin around? I don't think there's much point in it. It only got
added in 2.6.29, and all the blktrace tooling just uses the legacy
ioctls. All new uses should just use the TRACE_EVENT output.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists