[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251349485.6267.6.camel@concordia>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:04:45 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, miltonm@....com,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com, Ryan Arnold <rsa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Extending virtio_console to support multiple ports
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 21:15 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> [cc'ing some people who have made some commits in hvc_console.c]
>
> On (Wed) Aug 26 2009 [16:57:18], Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Tue) Aug 25 2009 [11:47:20], Amit Shah wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > Here is a new iteration of the patch series that implements a
> > > transport for guest and host communications.
> > >
> > > The code has been updated to reuse the virtio-console device instead
> > > of creating a new virtio-serial device.
> >
> > And the problem now is that hvc calls the put_chars function with
> > spinlocks held and we now allocate pages in send_buf(), called from
> > put_chars.
> >
> > A few solutions:
>
> [snip]
>
> > - Convert hvc's usage of spinlocks to mutexes. I've no idea how this
> > will play out; I'm no expert here. But I did try doing this and so far
> > it all looks OK. No lockups, lockdep warnings, nothing. I have full
> > debugging enabled. But this doesn't mean it's right.
>
> So just to test this further I added the capability to have more than
> one hvc console spawn from virtio_console, created two consoles and did
> a 'cat' of a file in each of the virtio-consoles. It's been running for
> half an hour now without any badness. No spew in debug logs too.
>
> I also checked the code in hvc_console.c that takes the spin_locks.
> Nothing there that runs from (or needs to run from) interrupt context.
> So the change to mutexes does seem reasonable. Also, the spinlock code
> was added really long back -- git blame shows Linus' first git commit
> introduced them in the git history, so it's pure legacy baggage.
I won't tell Ryan you called his code "pure legacy baggage" if you
don't ;)
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git;a=commitdiff;h=d450b4ae023fb4be175389c18f4f87677da03020
cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists