[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251422978.21865.2.camel@obelisk.thedillows.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:29:38 -0400
From: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Rui Santos <rsantos@...popie.com>,
Michael B??ker <m.bueker@...lin.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Reduce looping in the interrupt handler.
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 18:17 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> writes:
>
> > Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> :
> > [...]
> >> Sounds good.
> >
> > Gah, I was not able to test it with a decent packet load. Patch below against
> > the current tree:
>
> This kills the loop which was my concern.
>
> I will double check it works on my configuration.
> Then we have the question of does it work for those folks who have cards
> where the msi appeared to get lost.
>
> David any chance you can test this patch?
It'll be this weekend, but I can see cases where it can lock my chip up
-- they should be rare, but then I thought your case would be extremely
rare...
I think we'll need to go to a full separation between MSI and
level-triggered interrupt handlers, or at the very least mask everything
and handle it all in NAPI. That seems more viable now that I know
Francois is not terribly worried about diverging from the vendor driver
there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists