[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251472247.17617.74.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:10:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] perf_counter: fix possible /0 bug in swcounters
We have a race in the swcounter stuff where we can start counting a
counter that has never been enabled, this leads to a /0 situation.
The below avoids the /0 but doesn't close the race, this would need a
new counter state.
The race is due to perf_swcounter_is_counting() which cannot discern
between disabled due to scheduled out, and disabled for any other
reason.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/perf_counter.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 53abcbe..2b90d26 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -4103,6 +4103,7 @@ perf_counter_alloc(struct perf_counter_attr *attr,
hwc->sample_period = attr->sample_period;
if (attr->freq && attr->sample_freq)
hwc->sample_period = 1;
+ hwc->last_period = hwc->sample_period;
atomic64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists