[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251494174.5984.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:16:14 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 17:08 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> #define O_SYNC (O_FULLSYNC|O_DSYNC)
>
> - during the normal merge window I will add a real implementation for
> for O_FULLSYNC and O_RSYNC
>
> P.S. better naming suggestions for O_FULLSYNC welcome
Basically you are just ensuring that the metadata changes are being
synced together with the data changes, so how about O_ISYNC (inode
sync)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists