lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07556A5EA876@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:53:08 -0700
From:	"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 team <x86@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Alok N Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/apic: decouple legacy irq handling in ioapic

>From b37e4a846402d0ef7b1c19ea17d2d3aee22e81c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:29:42 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86/apic: RFC decouple legacy irq handling in ioapic

This patch uses platform feature flags to separate i8259/PIC from ioapic.
A cleaner solution might be adding abstraction for device interrupt
controller and moving apic initialization earlier so that
platforms with legacy replace devices can boot without the constriant of
PIC, PIT, etc. Such change obviously introduces risk.

The intention of this patch is also to show what kind of changes are needed
for non-pc x86 platform such as Moorestown MID. perhpas we can take a phased
approach.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index a22b710..ccc746f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
 #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
 #include <asm/uv/uv_hub.h>
 #include <asm/uv/uv_irq.h>
-
+#include <asm/platform_feature.h>
 #include <asm/apic.h>
 
 #define __apicdebuginit(type) static type __init
@@ -1447,6 +1447,12 @@ int setup_ioapic_entry(int apic_id, int irq,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline int is_i8259_legacy_irq(int irq)
+{
+	return ((irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
+		&& platform_has(X86_PLATFORM_FEATURE_8259));
+}
+
 static void setup_IO_APIC_irq(int apic_id, int pin, unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
 			      int trigger, int polarity)
 {
@@ -1480,7 +1486,7 @@ static void setup_IO_APIC_irq(int apic_id, int pin, unsigned int irq, struct irq
 	}
 
 	ioapic_register_intr(irq, desc, trigger);
-	if (irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
+	if (is_i8259_legacy_irq(irq))
 		disable_8259A_irq(irq);
 
 	ioapic_write_entry(apic_id, pin, entry);
@@ -1851,6 +1857,9 @@ __apicdebuginit(void) print_PIC(void)
 	unsigned int v;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	if (!platform_has(X86_PLATFORM_FEATURE_8259))
+		return;
+
 	if (apic_verbosity == APIC_QUIET)
 		return;
 
@@ -1914,6 +1923,8 @@ void __init enable_IO_APIC(void)
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags);
 		nr_ioapic_registers[apic] = reg_01.bits.entries+1;
 	}
+	if (!platform_has(X86_PLATFORM_FEATURE_8259))
+		return;
 	for(apic = 0; apic < nr_ioapics; apic++) {
 		int pin;
 		/* See if any of the pins is in ExtINT mode */
@@ -1968,6 +1979,8 @@ void disable_IO_APIC(void)
 	 */
 	clear_IO_APIC();
 
+	if (!platform_has(X86_PLATFORM_FEATURE_8259))
+		return;
 	/*
 	 * If the i8259 is routed through an IOAPIC
 	 * Put that IOAPIC in virtual wire mode
@@ -2198,7 +2211,7 @@ static unsigned int startup_ioapic_irq(unsigned int irq)
 	struct irq_cfg *cfg;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ioapic_lock, flags);
-	if (irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY) {
+	if (is_i8259_legacy_irq(irq)) {
 		disable_8259A_irq(irq);
 		if (i8259A_irq_pending(irq))
 			was_pending = 1;
@@ -2709,7 +2722,7 @@ static inline void init_IO_APIC_traps(void)
 			 * so default to an old-fashioned 8259
 			 * interrupt if we can..
 			 */
-			if (irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
+			if (is_i8259_legacy_irq(irq))
 				make_8259A_irq(irq);
 			else
 				/* Strange. Oh, well.. */
@@ -3052,9 +3065,13 @@ void __init setup_IO_APIC(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * calling enable_IO_APIC() is moved to setup_local_APIC for BP
+	 * For platforms that do not have legacy IRQs, IOAPIC IRQ can be any
+	 * number.
 	 */
-
-	io_apic_irqs = ~PIC_IRQS;
+	if (!platform_has(X86_PLATFORM_FEATURE_8259))
+		io_apic_irqs = ~0;
+	else
+		io_apic_irqs = ~PIC_IRQS;
 
 	apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs\n");
 	/*
@@ -3907,7 +3924,7 @@ static int __io_apic_set_pci_routing(struct device *dev, int irq,
 	/*
 	 * IRQs < 16 are already in the irq_2_pin[] map
 	 */
-	if (irq >= NR_IRQS_LEGACY) {
+	if (!is_i8259_legacy_irq(irq)) {
 		cfg = desc->chip_data;
 		add_pin_to_irq_node(cfg, node, ioapic, pin);
 	}
-- 
1.5.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ