[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908292305.55050.rety@poczta.onet.pl>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:05:54 +0200
From: Mario <rety@...zta.onet.pl>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Is acpi_ec_ecdt_probe() broken? (was: Re: ACPI locks hardware devices when it doesn't detect vista)
Exact model is Compal JFL92.
I've attached a dmidecode output.
Regards
Mario
Saturday 29 of August 2009 21:51:24 Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> dmidecode
>No, Mairo's system is a compal laptop, and I know that it does't have a
>ECDT (as well as mine btw, today hardware is quite similar)
>On top of that, I have asked Mairo to put acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(); just
>below the acpi_initialize_objects, but he said his system didn't boot
>after this change.
>_SB._INI does some black SMI magic that might need a EC after all.
>For reference, I attach acpidump of his system, and dmesg with some acpi
>debugging enabled.
>Mairo, could you post output of dmidecode, so I know exactly the laptop
>model.
>Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
View attachment "dmidecode_output" of type "text/plain" (6733 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists