[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090829100558.GH1634@ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:05:58 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@....de>,
Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@....de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
rdunlap@...otime.net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is
possible
On Fri 2009-08-28 07:49:38, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Rob Landley wrote:
>
>> Pavel's response was to attempt to document this. Not that journaling is
>> _bad_, but that it doesn't protect against this class of problem.
>
> I don't think anyone is disagreeing with the statement that journaling
> doesn't protect against this class of problems, but Pavel's statements
> didn't say that. he stated that ext3 is more dangerous than ext2.
Well, if you use 'common' fsck policy, ext3 _is_ more dangerous.
But I'm not pushing that to documentation, I'm trying to push info
everyone agrees with. (check the patches).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists