lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-dd5d19bafd90d33043a4a14b2e2d98612caa293c@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:57:40 GMT
From:	"tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Create rcutree plugins to handle hotplug CPU for multi-level trees

Commit-ID:  dd5d19bafd90d33043a4a14b2e2d98612caa293c
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/dd5d19bafd90d33043a4a14b2e2d98612caa293c
Author:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:58:16 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:34:39 +0200

rcu: Create rcutree plugins to handle hotplug CPU for multi-level trees

When offlining CPUs from a multi-level tree, there is the
possibility of offlining the last CPU from a given node when
there are preempted RCU read-side critical sections that
started life on one of the CPUs on that node.

In this case, the corresponding tasks will be enqueued via the
task_struct's rcu_node_entry list_head onto one of the
rcu_node's blocked_tasks[] lists.  These tasks need to be moved
somewhere else so that they will prevent the current grace
period from ending. That somewhere is the root rcu_node.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc: josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
LKML-Reference: <20090827215816.GA30472@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 include/linux/init_task.h |    2 +-
 include/linux/sched.h     |    4 +-
 kernel/rcutree.c          |    2 +
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h   |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index 79d4bae..9e7f2e8 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
 #define INIT_TASK_RCU_PREEMPT(tsk)					\
 	.rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0,					\
 	.rcu_read_unlock_special = 0,					\
-	.rcu_blocked_cpu = -1,						\
+	.rcu_blocked_node = NULL,					\
 	.rcu_node_entry = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rcu_node_entry),
 #else
 #define INIT_TASK_RCU_PREEMPT(tsk)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index bfca26d..3fe0315 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
 	int rcu_read_lock_nesting;
 	char rcu_read_unlock_special;
-	int rcu_blocked_cpu;
+	void *rcu_blocked_node;
 	struct list_head rcu_node_entry;
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
 
@@ -1735,7 +1735,7 @@ static inline void rcu_copy_process(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	p->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
 	p->rcu_read_unlock_special = 0;
-	p->rcu_blocked_cpu = -1;
+	p->rcu_blocked_node = NULL;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->rcu_node_entry);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index fee6316..d903e2f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct rcu_state rcu_bh_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_bh_state);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_bh_data);
 
 extern long rcu_batches_completed_sched(void);
+static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp);
 static void cpu_quiet_msk(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp,
 			  struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags);
 static void cpu_quiet_msk_finish(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags);
@@ -876,6 +877,7 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 			spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
 			break;
 		}
+		rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp);
 		mask = rnp->grpmask;
 		spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);	/* irqs remain disabled. */
 		rnp = rnp->parent;
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 201334c..04343be 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
 		rnp = rdp->mynode;
 		spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
 		t->rcu_read_unlock_special |= RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
-		t->rcu_blocked_cpu = cpu;
+		t->rcu_blocked_node = (void *)rnp;
 
 		/*
 		 * If this CPU has already checked in, then this task
@@ -170,12 +170,21 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
 	if (special & RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED) {
 		t->rcu_read_unlock_special &= ~RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED;
 
-		/* Remove this task from the list it blocked on. */
-		rnp = rcu_preempt_state.rda[t->rcu_blocked_cpu]->mynode;
-		spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
+		/*
+		 * Remove this task from the list it blocked on.  The
+		 * task can migrate while we acquire the lock, but at
+		 * most one time.  So at most two passes through loop.
+		 */
+		for (;;) {
+			rnp = (struct rcu_node *)t->rcu_blocked_node;
+			spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
+			if (rnp == (struct rcu_node *)t->rcu_blocked_node)
+				break;
+			spin_unlock(&rnp->lock);
+		}
 		empty = list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[rnp->gpnum & 0x1]);
 		list_del_init(&t->rcu_node_entry);
-		t->rcu_blocked_cpu = -1;
+		t->rcu_blocked_node = NULL;
 
 		/*
 		 * If this was the last task on the current list, and if
@@ -262,6 +271,47 @@ static int rcu_preempted_readers(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 
 /*
+ * Handle tasklist migration for case in which all CPUs covered by the
+ * specified rcu_node have gone offline.  Move them up to the root
+ * rcu_node.  The reason for not just moving them to the immediate
+ * parent is to remove the need for rcu_read_unlock_special() to
+ * make more than two attempts to acquire the target rcu_node's lock.
+ *
+ * The caller must hold rnp->lock with irqs disabled.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp,
+				      struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct list_head *lp;
+	struct list_head *lp_root;
+	struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+	struct task_struct *tp;
+
+	if (rnp == rnp_root)
+		return;  /* Shouldn't happen: at least one CPU online. */
+
+	/*
+	 * Move tasks up to root rcu_node.  Rely on the fact that the
+	 * root rcu_node can be at most one ahead of the rest of the
+	 * rcu_nodes in terms of gp_num value.  This fact allows us to
+	 * move the blocked_tasks[] array directly, element by element.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+		lp = &rnp->blocked_tasks[i];
+		lp_root = &rnp_root->blocked_tasks[i];
+		while (!list_empty(lp)) {
+			tp = list_entry(lp->next, typeof(*tp), rcu_node_entry);
+			spin_lock(&rnp_root->lock); /* irqs already disabled */
+			list_del(&tp->rcu_node_entry);
+			tp->rcu_blocked_node = rnp_root;
+			list_add(&tp->rcu_node_entry, lp_root);
+			spin_unlock(&rnp_root->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+/*
  * Do CPU-offline processing for preemptable RCU.
  */
 static void rcu_preempt_offline_cpu(int cpu)
@@ -410,6 +460,15 @@ static int rcu_preempted_readers(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 
 /*
+ * Because preemptable RCU does not exist, it never needs to migrate
+ * tasks that were blocked within RCU read-side critical sections.
+ */
+static void rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp,
+				      struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+}
+
+/*
  * Because preemptable RCU does not exist, it never needs CPU-offline
  * processing.
  */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ