[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19097.14413.89047.384281@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:16:45 +0200
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
Mikael Pettersson writes:
> Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> > On Thursday 27 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:34:53 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > > (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14015
> > > > Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite
> > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
> > > > Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (12 days old)
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125029329805643&w=3D4
> > >
> > > Not fixed. With 2.6.31-rc7 I'm still seeing repeatable testsuite
> > > failures on powerpc64. Reverting to 2.6.30 makes the failures go away.
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > I guess 2.6.31-rc8 doesn't make any difference, does it?
>
> I've scheduled a number of gcc bootstraps and testsuite runs
> with -rc8 on x86, powerpc64, and arm. I'll post an update in
> a day or so.
2.6.31-rc8 results in bogus testsuite failures on all three platforms.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists