[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908291858400.19335@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:59:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>
cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 team <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...radead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Alok N Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] x86/boot: Moorestown patch set based on platform_set
abstraction
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Pan, Jacob jun wrote:
> Based on platform_setup patchset posted by tglx (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/21/358)
>
> These Moorestown patches have become much simplified once ported to the new
> platform_setup layer.
>
> Now the platform feature flags are less useful, in fact they
> are only used in separating ioapic and 8259 now, so once the interrupt
> controller code is drivernized, we would not need the platform feature flags
> in the core.
I don't think that we need big changes in the ioapic code. All you
need can be done with way simpler tweaking.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists