[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1251659144.20987.18.camel@wall-e>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:05:44 +0200
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix proc_file_write missing ppos update
Am Samstag, den 29.08.2009, 19:16 -0400 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 06:38:12PM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> > The following fix a long standing issue in the proc_file_write function,
> > which doesn't update the ppos file position pointer.
>
> The right fix is to get rid of the last remaining
> read_proc_t/write_proc_t instances and switch everyone to implement file
> operations. Alexey has been working on this on and off for a while.
>
Switching all users of read_proc_t/write_proc_t to file operation is a
huge job. About 180 files must be fixed.
But the main reason not to do this is because the breakage of "out of
tree" drivers.
I like the current simplified proc interface. It saves a lot of code
duplication because the basic operations will be handled inside the
kernel and not in the driver.
There is no reason for Alexey to finish his work, submit it and maybe it
will be accepted.
In the meantime i will see my patch as the preferred solution: a cleanup
of the current interface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists