[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A99E8CB.1040600@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:49:47 -0400
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip tracing/kprobes 3/6] kprobes/x86: Fix to add __kprobes
to in-kernel fault handing functions
Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:23:11PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Add __kprobes to the functions which handles in-kernel fixable page faults.
>> Since kprobes can cause those in-kernel page faults by accessing kprobe data
>> structures, probing those fault functions will cause fault-int3-loop
>> (do_page_fault has already been marked as __kprobes).
>
>
> BTW, is it possible to assert a struct kprobe (and its pointer members)
> haven't been allocated through vmalloc() ?
>
How about calling vmalloc_sync() always before registering kprobes? :-)
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists