lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:09:50 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, "linux-pm" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PM: Asynchronous resume of devices On Sunday 30 August 2009, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > > > The same goes for the noirq versions. > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought about that, but there are a few things to figure out: > > > > > > - how many threads to start > > > > > > > > > > That's a tough question. Right now you start roughly as many threads > > > > > as there are async devices. That seems like overkill. > > > > > > > > In fact they are substantially fewer than that, for the following reasons. > > > > > > > > First, the async framework will not start more than MAX_THREADS threads, > > > > which is 256 at the moment. This number is less than the number of async > > > > devices to handle on an average system. > > > > > > Okay, but MAX_THREADS isn't under your control. Remember also that > > > each thread takes up some memory, and during hibernation we are in a > > > memory-constrained situation. > > > > We keep some extra free memory for things like this. It's not likely to be > > exhausted by the async threads alone. > > What extra memory? You are creating quite a lot of threads. For 256 of > them, it would take cca 2MB... We never start that many threads and even if there's not enough memory to start a new thread, the async framework will handle that for us. > You recently removed code from s2disk that freed 4MB of extra memory, That was removed from s2ram. For STD we still have PAGES_FOR_IO and SPARE_PAGES, nothing's changed there. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists