linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ata_piix: parallel scanning on PATA needs an extra locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:13:21 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata_piix: parallel scanning on PATA needs an extra
 locking

> Lets fix all such races by adding an extra locking to ->set_piomode
> and ->set_dmamode methods for PATA controllers.

Would it not be better to take the host lock in libata-core for these
cases so that we fix all the adapters in one swoop. Even if we are doing
this lock taking in the controller specific code it seems the right lock
to use ?

Looks fine as a temproary quickfix tho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/