[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A9B3B0B.9090009@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:52:59 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
mikew@...gle.com, fchecconi@...il.com, paolo.valente@...more.it,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp, guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
righi.andrea@...il.com, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, agk@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
jmarchan@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/23] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair
queuing
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> This patch changes noop to use queue scheduling code from elevator layer.
> One can go back to old noop by deselecting CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP_HIER.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nauman Rafique <nauman@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Not sure why noop needs hierarchical fair queueing
support, but this patch is so small we might as well
take it to keep things consistent between schedulers.
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists