[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <360d07ecdf467c2e15231f420375ffee.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:09:55 +0900 (JST)
From: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] memcg: drain per cpu stock
Balbir Singh さんは書きました:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-08-28
> 13:28:09]:
>
>>
>> Add function for dropping per-cpu stock of charges.
>> This is called when
>> - cpu is unplugged.
>> - force_empty
>> - recalim seems to be not easy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
> The complexity of this patch and additional code make percpu_counter
> more attractive. Why not work on percpu_counter if that is not as good
> as we expect it to be and in turn help other exploiters as well.
- percpu counter is slow.
- percpu counter is "counter". we use res_counter not as counter but as
accounting for "limit". This "borrow" charges is core of this patch.
- Adding "flush" ops for percpu counter will be much more mess.
- This implementation handles mem->res and mem->memsw at the same time.
This reduces much overhead.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists