[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090831122316.GM4770@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:53:16 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] memcg: uncharge in batched manner
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-08-31 21:14:10]:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> > Does this effect deleting of a group and delay it by a large amount?
> >> >
> >> plz see what cgroup_release_and_xxxx fixed. This is not for delay
> >> but for race-condition, which makes rmdir sleep permanently.
> >>
> >
> > I've seen those patches, where rmdir() can hang. My conern was time
> > elapsed since we do css_get() and do a cgroup_release_and_wake_rmdir()
> >
> plz read unmap() and truncate() code.
> The number of pages handled without cond_resched() is limited.
>
>
I understand that part, I was referring to tasks stuck doing rmdir()
while we do batched uncharge, will it be very visible to the end user?
cond_resched() is bad in this case.. since it means we'll stay longer
before we release the cgroup.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists