[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A9BD13E.4040501@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:33:50 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] drop_monitor: fix trace_napi_poll_hit()
Neil Horman a écrit :
> I still see a large number of drivers that update dev->last_rx, although its
> not all as I look through the list, so something definately seems amiss.
Some drivers still update dev->last_rx for their own needs, not a core
network concern.
But a cleanup is certainly possible on few other drivers, about a dozen
if I count correctly.
>
> If its not going to be consistently updated, why are still carrying that field
> in dev? Are we just waiting on someone to do the janitorial work to remove it?
> If so, I can, and I'll fix up the drop monitor in the process, to use a private
> timestamp.
We have to keep dev->last_rx for bonding use, so please use a private
timestamp for drop monitor.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists