[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908311407060.13931@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:09:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] tracing/events: convert NAPI's tracepoint via
TRACE_EVENT
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > - Convert NAPI's tracepoint via TRACE_EVENT macro, the output information
> > like below:
>
> I think as long as it does not touch tracing infrastructure (which
> your patches dont do in their current form) this should be
> done/merged via the networking tree.
I agree, all changes that are in include/trace/events/ and trace point
usage can stay within the subsystem tree.
>
> [ There might be some small collisions in define_trace.h (because
> these tracepoints move from legacy to new-style TRACE_EVENT()
> form) but that's OK. ]
But changes to anything in include/trace or kernel/trace needs to go
throught the tracing subsystem. This includes a changes to define_trace.h.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists