lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090831194013.GC4237@pc-ras4041.res.insa>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:13 +0200
From:	Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	srostedt@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: remove mentioning of legacy latency_trace
 file from documentation

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:19:38PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote :
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:50:35PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> >  # tracer: irqsoff
> > @@ -382,7 +374,7 @@ The above is mostly meaningful for kernel developers.
> >  
> >    time: This differs from the trace file output. The trace file output
> >  	includes an absolute timestamp. The timestamp used by the
> > -	latency_trace file is relative to the start of the trace.
> > +	trace file is relative to the start of the trace.
> 
> 
> Not only is it wrong, but the sentence is now completely antithetic.

Oops. this wasn't meant to be there. I'll fix that.

Regards,
-- 
Albin Tonnerre, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development,
consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ