[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090831194013.GC4237@pc-ras4041.res.insa>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:40:13 +0200
From: Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: srostedt@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: remove mentioning of legacy latency_trace
file from documentation
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:19:38PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote :
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:50:35PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> > # tracer: irqsoff
> > @@ -382,7 +374,7 @@ The above is mostly meaningful for kernel developers.
> >
> > time: This differs from the trace file output. The trace file output
> > includes an absolute timestamp. The timestamp used by the
> > - latency_trace file is relative to the start of the trace.
> > + trace file is relative to the start of the trace.
>
>
> Not only is it wrong, but the sentence is now completely antithetic.
Oops. this wasn't meant to be there. I'll fix that.
Regards,
--
Albin Tonnerre, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux development,
consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists