[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090901141812.GT19719@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:18:12 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@...il.com>,
David Xiao <dxiao@...adcom.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
v4l2_linux <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: How to efficiently handle DMA and cache on ARMv7 ? (was "Is
get_user_pages() enough to prevent pages from being swapped out ?")
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 03:43:48PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I might be missing something obvious, but I fail to see how VIVT caches
> could work at all with multiple mappings. If a kernel-allocated buffer
> is DMA'ed to, we certainly want to invalidate all cache lines that store
> buffer data. As the cache doesn't care about physical addresses we thus
> need to invalidate all virtual mappings for the buffer. If the buffer is
> mmap'ed in userspace I don't see how that would be done.
You need to ask MM gurus about that. I don't touch the Linux MM very
often so tend to keep forgetting how it works. However, it does work
for shared mappings of files on CPUs with VIVT caches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists