linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1251815012.3864.55.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date:	Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:23:32 -0500
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
To:	akataria@...are.com
Cc:	Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>,
	Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
	Maxime Austruy <maustruy@...are.com>,
	Bhavesh Davda <bhavesh@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA.

On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 14:53 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
> Hi James, 
> 
> Thanks for your comments. 
> 
> On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 11:00 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 10:28 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > > VMware PVSCSI driver - v2.
> > 
> > OK, so the first thing that springs to mind is that we already have one
> > of these things: the ibmvscsi ... is there no way we can share code
> > between this and the other PV drivers?
> 
> I took a quick look at the ibmvscsi driver, and there are lot of
> differences between the two, mainly the ABI that is shared between the
> hypervisor and driver differ.

Well, that's pretty abstractable, surely?  However, there is an
interesting question of what the best hypervisor interface actually is.

>  Also the ibmvscsi driver seems to offer a
> lot of other features as well, like the SRP. 

SRP is the protocol transfer abstraction.  It's just a way of packaging
up SCSI commands for transfer over a DMA protocol (OK, so it was
envisaged that the DMA protocol would be RDMA, but a hypervisor
interface is also a DMA protocol).

> The pvscsi driver is a simple SCSI adapter driver and is basically no
> different than any other SCSI driver written for a particular HBA.

Well, it is really ... hopefully all the hypervisor interfaces won't
decide to be completely incompatible, so there's a good chance of code
sharing between them.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/