[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090901161651.GO22870@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:16:51 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>, akataria@...are.com,
Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
Maxime Austruy <maustruy@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:12:43AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> I'm not really sure we should be trying to force drivers to share just
> because they are paravirtualized -- if there is real commonality, then
> sure put it in common code, but different hypervisors are probably as
> different as different hardware.
I really disagree. This kind of virtualised drivers are pretty much
communication protocols, and not hardware. As such, why design a new one?
If there's an infelicity in the ibmvscsi protocol, it makes sense to
design a new one. But being different for the sake of being different
is just a way to generate a huge amount of make-work.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists