| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090901174724.GC3753@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:47:24 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp> Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com Subject: Re: Regarding dm-ioband tests On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:50:11PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Hi Ryo, > > I decided to play a bit more with dm-ioband and started doing some > testing. I am doing a simple two dd threads doing reads and don't seem > to be gettting the fairness. So thought will ask you what's the issue > here. Is there an issue with my testing procedure. > > I got one 40G SATA drive (no hardware queuing). I have created two > partitions on that disk /dev/sdd1 and /dev/sdd2 and created two ioband > devices ioband1 and ioband2 on partitions sdd1 and sdd2 respectively. The > weights of ioband1 and ioband2 devices are 200 and 100 respectively. > > I am assuming that this setup will create two default groups and IO > going to partition sdd1 should get double the BW of partition sdd2. > > But it looks like I am not gettting that behavior. Following is the output > of "dmsetup table" command. This snapshot has been taken every 2 seconds > while IO was going on. Column 9 seems to be containing how many sectors > of IO has been done on a particular io band device and group. Looking at > the snapshot, it does not look like that ioband1 default group got double > the BW of ioband2 default group. > > Am I doing something wrong here? > I tried another variant of test. This time I also created two additional groups on ioband1 devices and linked these to cgroups test1 and test2 and launched two dd threads in two cgroups on device ioband1. There also I don't seem to be getting the right fairness numbers for cgroup test1 and test2. Script to create ioband devices and additional groups ----------------------------------------------------- echo "0 $(blockdev --getsize /dev/sdd1) ioband /dev/sdd1 1 0 0 none" "weight 0 :200" | dmsetup create ioband1 echo "0 $(blockdev --getsize /dev/sdd2) ioband /dev/sdd2 1 0 0 none" "weight 0 :100" | dmsetup create ioband2 # Some code to mount and create cgroups. # Read group id test1_id=`cat /cgroup/ioband/test1/blkio.id` test2_id=`cat /cgroup/ioband/test2/blkio.id` test1_weight=200 test2_weight=100 dmsetup message ioband1 0 type cgroup dmsetup message ioband1 0 attach $test1_id dmsetup message ioband1 0 attach $test2_id dmsetup message ioband1 0 weight $test1_id:$test1_weight dmsetup message ioband1 0 weight $test2_id:$test2_weight mount /dev/mapper/ioband1 /mnt/sdd1 mount /dev/mapper/ioband2 /mnt/sdd2 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Following are two dd jobs ------------------------- dd if=/mnt/sdd1/testzerofile1 of=/dev/null & echo $! > /cgroup/ioband/test1/tasks dd if=/mnt/sdd1/testzerofile2 of=/dev/null & echo $! > /cgroup/ioband/test2/tasks Following are "dmsetup status" results every 2 seconds ====================================================== ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 689 0 86336 0 0 0 3 650 3 81472 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1725 0 217024 0 0 0 3 1270 11 158912 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2690 0 338744 0 0 0 3 1978 15 247856 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3762 0 474040 0 0 0 3 2583 21 323736 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4745 0 598064 0 0 0 3 3275 27 410392 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5737 0 723120 0 0 0 3 3985 31 499592 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6815 0 859184 0 0 0 3 4594 37 575864 0 0 0 ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7823 0 986288 0 0 0 3 5276 43 661360 0 0 0 "dmsetup table" output ====================== ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 8:50 1 4 192 none weight 768 :100 ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 8:49 1 4 192 cgroup weight 768 :200 2:200 3:100 Because I am using "weight" policy, I thought that test1 cgroup with id "2" will issue double the number of requests of cgroup test2 with id "3". But that does not seem to be happening here. Is there an issue with my testing method. Thanks Vivek > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 96 0 11528 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 82 0 9736 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 748 2 93032 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 896 0 112232 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 1326 5 165816 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 1816 0 228312 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 1943 6 243712 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 2692 0 338760 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 2461 10 308576 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 3618 0 455608 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 3118 11 391352 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 4406 0 555032 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 3734 15 468760 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 5273 0 664328 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 4307 17 540784 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 6181 0 778992 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 4930 19 619208 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 7028 0 885728 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 5599 22 703280 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 7815 0 985024 0 0 0 > > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 1 -1 6586 27 827456 0 0 0 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 1 -1 8327 0 1049624 0 0 0 > > Following are details of my test setup. > --------------------------------------- > I took dm-ioband patch version 1.12.3 and applied on 2.6.31-rc6. > > Created ioband devices using following command. > ---------------------------------------------- > echo "0 $(blockdev --getsize /dev/sdd1) ioband /dev/sdd1 1 0 0 none" > "weight 0 :200" | dmsetup create ioband1 > echo "0 $(blockdev --getsize /dev/sdd2) ioband /dev/sdd2 1 0 0 none" > "weight 0 :100" | dmsetup create ioband2 > > mount /dev/mapper/ioband1 /mnt/sdd1 > mount /dev/mapper/ioband2 /mnt/sdd2 > > Started two dd threads > ====================== > dd if=/mnt/sdd1/testzerofile1 of=/dev/null & > dd if=/mnt/sdd2/testzerofile1 of=/dev/null & > > Output of dmsetup table command > ================================ > ioband2: 0 40355280 ioband 8:50 1 4 192 none weight 768 :100 > ioband1: 0 37768752 ioband 8:49 1 4 192 none weight 768 :200 > > Thanks > Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists