[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A9D600B.4020405@sandeen.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 12:55:23 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs compat_ioctl?
Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Christoph Hellwig<hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>> I think you are right, the constant used is incorrect. Does the small
>> patch below fix it for you?
>
> Yes, after adding this patch, xfs_fsr works.
Crud, sorry about that. I swear I ran 32-bit xfstests under a 64-bit
kernel, but I think we were lacking in fsr coverage....
-Eric
>> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c 2009-08-31 15:25:06.093044591 -0300
>> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c 2009-08-31 15:25:10.856544216 -0300
>> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ xfs_file_compat_ioctl(
>> case XFS_IOC_GETVERSION_32:
>> cmd = _NATIVE_IOC(cmd, long);
>> return xfs_file_ioctl(filp, cmd, p);
>> - case XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT: {
>> + case XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT_32: {
>> struct xfs_swapext sxp;
>> struct compat_xfs_swapext __user *sxu = arg;
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@....sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists