lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090902112250.GD3817@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:52:50 +0530
From:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/8] sched: add smt_gain

On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:34:35AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The idea is that multi-threading a core yields more work capacity than
> a single thread, provide a way to express a static gain for threads.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
>  include/linux/sched.h    |    1 +
>  include/linux/topology.h |    1 +
>  kernel/sched.c           |    8 +++++++-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
>  	unsigned int newidle_idx;
>  	unsigned int wake_idx;
>  	unsigned int forkexec_idx;
> +	unsigned int smt_gain;
>  	int flags;			/* See SD_* */
>  	enum sched_domain_level level;
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
>  				| SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER,	\
>  	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
>  	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
> +	.smt_gain		= 1178,	/* 15% */	\

/* 15% of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE */ , I suppose.

>  }
>  #endif
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -8490,9 +8490,15 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int 
>  		weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
>  		/*
>  		 * SMT siblings share the power of a single core.
> +		 * Usually multiple threads get a better yield out of
> +		 * that one core than a single thread would have,
> +		 * reflect that in sd->smt_gain.
>  		 */
> -		if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1)
> +		if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1) {
> +			power *= sd->smt_gain;
>  			power /= weight;
> +			power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
> +		}
>  		sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, power);
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> -- 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ